Structured PREreview of Metadata collected from 500 articles in the field of ecology and evolution
- Published
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- How would you rate the quality of this data set?
- I don’t know
- Does this dataset follow FAIR and CARE principles?
- I don’t know
- Does the dataset have enough metadata?
- I don’t know
- Does this dataset include a way to list or track changes or versions? If so, does it seem accurate?
- I don’t know
- Does this dataset show signs of alteration beyond instances of likely human error, such as censorship, deletion, or redaction, that are not accounted for otherwise?
- I don’t know
- Is the dataset well-suited to support its stated research purpose?
- I don’t know
- Does this dataset support the researcher’s stated conclusions?
- I don’t know
- Is the dataset granular enough to be a reliable standard of measurement?
- I don’t know
- Is the dataset relatively error-free?
- I don’t know
- Is this dataset likely to be of interest to researchers in its corresponding field of study, to most researchers, or to the general public? How consequential is it likely to seem to that audience or those audiences?
- I don’t know
- Is this dataset ready to be shared?
- I don’t know
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.